Review



rab11a  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rab11a
    Rab11a, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 33 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+rab11a/Rab1A+Rabbit+mAb/pm41686868-85-38-39
    Average 94 stars, based on 33 article reviews
    rab11a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Cell-Signaling:

    Article Title: Altered chaperone–nonmuscle myosin II interactions drive pathogenicity of the UNC45A c.710T>C variant in osteo-oto-hepato-enteric syndrome
    Article Snippet: For immunoblotting, anti-NMIIA (BioLegend, 909801), anti-NMIIB (BioLegend, 909901), and anti–α-tubulin (DSHB, 12G10) were used in dilutions of 1:1,000 and for IF at 1:500. .. Primary antibodies for IF included anti-EEA1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-33585) and anti-Rab11a (Cell Signaling Technology, 2413S), in dilutions of 1:100 and 1:50, respectively; anti-LAMP1 (BD Pharmingen, 553792) diluted 1:500; anti-Paxillin (BD Transduction Laboratories, 610051) diluted 1:100; anti-Zyxin (Proteintech, 10330-1-AP) diluted 1:50; and anti-HA (Cell Signaling Technology, 3724S) diluted 1:1,000. .. Alexa Fluor 568–conjugated phalloidin (Invitrogen, A12380) was used in a dilution of 1:500 to visualize the actin cytoskeleton, and nuclei were stained with HOECHST (MilliporeSigma, B2261) diluted 1:10,000.

    other:

    Article Title: Multi-scale photocatalytic proximity labeling reveals cell surface neighbors on and between cells
    Article Snippet: Antibodies were purchased including: Ctx (cetuximab, Selleck Chemicals, A2000), Trz (trastuzumab, Selleck Chemicals, A2007), anti-EGFR (Thermo Scientific, MA5–13319; Cell Signaling Technology, 4267S), anti-HER2 (Cell Signaling Technology, 2165S), anti-MIF (Proteintech, 20415–1-AP), anti-GSTP1 (Proteintech, 15902–1-AP), anti-ZO1 (Proteintech, 21772–1-AP), anti-PGRMC1 (Cell Signaling Technology, 13856T), anti-Integrin β1 (Cell Signaling Technology, 4706S), anti-β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-47778), anti-LGALS3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 12733S), anti-CD44 (Cell Signaling Technology, 3578S), anti-ADDB (Proteintech, 14640–1-AP), anti-PON2 (Abcam, ab183710), anti-PTPRF (anti-LAR, R&D system, MAB3004-SP), anti-Rab11a (Cell Signaling Technology, 2413S), anti-RHOC (Cell Signaling Technology, 3430T), anti-PDCD6IP (Proteintech, 12422–1-AP), anti-BRAF (Cell Signaling Technology, 14814S), anti-Tid1 (Cell Signaling Technology, 4775S), anti-CKAP4 (Proteintech, 16686–1-AP), anti-Rac1/2/3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 2465T), anti-DOCK4 (Proteintech, 21861–1-AP), anti-SIGMAR1 (Proteintech, 15168–1-AP), anti-PKACa (Cell Signaling Technology, 4782S), anti-DNAJC13 (Bethyl Laboratories, A304–872A), anti-β-catenin (Cell Signaling Technology, 8480T), anti-Flot2 (anti-Flotilin 2, Cell Signaling Technology, 3436S), mouse IgG1 isotype control (BD Biosciences, 556648), anti-CD3D (Cell Signaling Technology, 31857S), anti-CD19 (Cell Signaling Technology, 90176T), anti-CDCP1 (Cell Signaling Technology, 4115S) and anti-Myc (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-40).

    Article Title: DDX3 suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma progression through modulating the secretion and composition of exosome
    Article Snippet: The following antibodies were used in this study: anti-DDX3 (sc-81247, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), anti-TSG101 (sc-7964, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Alix (#2171, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-CD63 (sc-5275, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Hsc70 (sc-7298, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Hsp90 (#4877, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Calnexin (#2679, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Rab5a (ab18211, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-Rab5b (ab72907, Abcam), anti-Rab7a (#9367, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Rab7b (ab193360, Abcam), anti-Rab11a (#2413, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Rab11b (#2414, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Rab27a (sc-74586, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Rab35 (#11329-2-AP, ProteinTech Group Inc, Chicago, IL, USA), anti-β-Actin (#A5441, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and anti-GAPDH (#G8795, Sigma-Aldrich).

    Western Blot:

    Article Title: Reconstitution of Rab11-FIP4 Expression Rescues Cellular Homeostasis in Cystinosis
    Article Snippet: .. The following antibodies were used for immunoblotting in this study: rabbit anti-Rab11-FIP4 (LSC353582, Lifespan biosciences), anti-RAB7 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9367S), anti-RAB11a (Cell Signaling Technology, 5589S), anti-actin (Santa Cruz Technologies, SC-7210 or SC-47778); anti-KDEL (Enzo Life Sciences, ADI-SPA-827), anti-LAMP1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-19992); anti-LAMP2A (ThermoFisher Scientific, 51-2200), and rabbit anti-LC3B (2775, Cell Signaling Technology). ..

    Article Title: Diminished Neuronal ESCRT-0 Function Exacerbates AMPA Receptor Derangement and Accelerates Prion-Induced Neurodegeneration
    Article Snippet: Samples were boiled for 5min in LDS loading buffer (Invitrogen) and electrophoresed through a 10% Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen) before transfer to a nitrocellulose membrane. .. The following antibodies were used for Western blotting: anti-PrP (1:10,000, mouse anti-PrP POM1; Polymenidou et al., 2008), anti-Hrs (1:5000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-b actin (1:5000, Genetex), antiGAPDH (1:5000, Novus), anti-STAM1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Tsg101 (1:500, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CHMP2B (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-ubiquitin (1:7000, Dako), anti-Rab11a (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Rab7 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Rab5 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-GluN1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-VPS35 (1:10,000, Genetex), anti-LC3I/II (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p62 (1:4000, Abnova), anti-synapsin-1 (1:10,000, Thermo Fisher Scientific), anti-synaptophysin (1:10,000, Invitrogen), anti-PSD95 (1:5000, Calbiochem), anti-K63 linked ubiquitin (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-K48 linked ubiquitin (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-VAMP2 (1:10,000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-SNAP25 (1:10,000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-mGluR5 (1:2000, Cell Signaling Technology), antiGluA1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-phosphorylated GluA1 S831 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-phosphorylated GluA1 S845 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology). ..

    Ubiquitin Proteomics:

    Article Title: Diminished Neuronal ESCRT-0 Function Exacerbates AMPA Receptor Derangement and Accelerates Prion-Induced Neurodegeneration
    Article Snippet: Samples were boiled for 5min in LDS loading buffer (Invitrogen) and electrophoresed through a 10% Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen) before transfer to a nitrocellulose membrane. .. The following antibodies were used for Western blotting: anti-PrP (1:10,000, mouse anti-PrP POM1; Polymenidou et al., 2008), anti-Hrs (1:5000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-b actin (1:5000, Genetex), antiGAPDH (1:5000, Novus), anti-STAM1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Tsg101 (1:500, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CHMP2B (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-ubiquitin (1:7000, Dako), anti-Rab11a (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Rab7 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Rab5 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-GluN1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-VPS35 (1:10,000, Genetex), anti-LC3I/II (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-p62 (1:4000, Abnova), anti-synapsin-1 (1:10,000, Thermo Fisher Scientific), anti-synaptophysin (1:10,000, Invitrogen), anti-PSD95 (1:5000, Calbiochem), anti-K63 linked ubiquitin (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-K48 linked ubiquitin (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-VAMP2 (1:10,000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-SNAP25 (1:10,000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-mGluR5 (1:2000, Cell Signaling Technology), antiGluA1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-phosphorylated GluA1 S831 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-phosphorylated GluA1 S845 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology). ..

    Blocking Assay:

    Article Title: Cholesterol Deficiency Directs Autophagy‐Dependent Secretion of Extracellular Vesicles
    Article Snippet: Before antibody staining, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Electron Microscopy Sciences, 15714) at room temperature for 20 min. Next, cells were permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X‐100 (Sigma‐Aldrich, 93443) for 20 min and then incubated in blocking buffer (5% donkey or goat serum, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, 017‐000‐121 or 005‐000‐121; 0.1% Triton X‐100) for 1 h at room temperature. .. The primary antibodies used for these studies were diluted in blocking buffer and included rabbit anti‐Rab5 (Cell Signaling Technology, 3547, 1:200), rabbit anti‐EEA1 (Cell Signaling Technology, 3288, 1:200), rabbit anti‐Rab7 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9367, 1:200), rabbit anti‐Rab11a (Cell Signaling Technology, 5589, 1:200), mouse anti‐p62 (Cell Signaling Technology, 88588, 1:200), rabbit anti‐LC3B (Cell Signaling Technology, 3868, 1:200), rabbit anti‐LAMP1 (Novus, 19294, 1:1000) and mouse anti‐CD63 (Novus, 77913, 1:500). .. Primary antibodies were visualized with Alexa Fluor‐conjugated secondary antibodies (Life Technologies, A11001, A21437 and A31570 ; 1:500).



    Similar Products

    94
    ABclonal Biotechnology rabbit monoclonal anti rab11a
    Rabbit Monoclonal Anti Rab11a, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+rab11a/RAB11A+Rabbit+mAb/pmc13194641-15-0-4
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit monoclonal anti rab11a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech anti rab11a
    Anti Rab11a, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+rab11a/RAB11A-Specific+Antibody/pm41840509-159-64-67
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti rab11a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Proteintech rabbit anti rab11
    Rabbit Anti Rab11, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+rab11a/RAB11A%2FB+Antibody/pm41803143-286-58-63
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti rab11 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    OriGene mouse
    Mouse, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+rab11a/RAB11A+Goat+Polyclonal+Antibody/pm41700757-243-71-111
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rab11a
    Rab11a, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+rab11a/Rab1A+Rabbit+mAb/pm41686868-85-38-39
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rab11a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc primary antibodies targeting rab11a
    Primary Antibodies Targeting Rab11a, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+rab11a/Rab11a+Antibody/pm41686868-149-4-8
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary antibodies targeting rab11a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti rab11a
    Rabbit Anti Rab11a, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+rab11a/pmc12835112-175-28-32
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti rab11a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc primary antibodies against rab11a
    Identification and validation of <t>RAB11A</t> as an FGFR3-related gene in NMIBC. ( A ) Differential gene expression analysis of TCGA bladder cancer dataset comparing Ta (non-invasive) versus T1–T4 (invasive) stages. RAB11A was identified as one of the significantly upregulated genes in Ta tumors. ( B ) Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of patients in the TCGA BLCA cohort grouped by high and low RAB11A expression ( n = 406). Higher RAB11A expression is associated with poorer overall survival. ( C , D ) Correlation analysis of RAB11A and RAB11B expression with FGFR3 expression in TCGA BLCA dataset. RAB11A showed a stronger positive correlation with FGFR3 than other Rab GTPases. ( E , F ) Immunohistochemical staining of RAB11A in tumor samples from NMIBC patients collected at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University ( n = 36), showing elevated expression of RAB11A in Ta-stage tumors. Scale bar = 100 μm. ( G , H ) mRNA and protein levels of RAB11A detected in clinical bladder cancer tissues by qRT-PCR and Western blotting, confirming its upregulation in NMIBC compared to MIBC samples. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Student’s t-test. Data are shown as mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant
    Primary Antibodies Against Rab11a, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+rab11a/Rab11a+Antibody/pmc12835112-115-0-4
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary antibodies against rab11a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti rab11a
    Identification and validation of <t>RAB11A</t> as an FGFR3-related gene in NMIBC. ( A ) Differential gene expression analysis of TCGA bladder cancer dataset comparing Ta (non-invasive) versus T1–T4 (invasive) stages. RAB11A was identified as one of the significantly upregulated genes in Ta tumors. ( B ) Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of patients in the TCGA BLCA cohort grouped by high and low RAB11A expression ( n = 406). Higher RAB11A expression is associated with poorer overall survival. ( C , D ) Correlation analysis of RAB11A and RAB11B expression with FGFR3 expression in TCGA BLCA dataset. RAB11A showed a stronger positive correlation with FGFR3 than other Rab GTPases. ( E , F ) Immunohistochemical staining of RAB11A in tumor samples from NMIBC patients collected at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University ( n = 36), showing elevated expression of RAB11A in Ta-stage tumors. Scale bar = 100 μm. ( G , H ) mRNA and protein levels of RAB11A detected in clinical bladder cancer tissues by qRT-PCR and Western blotting, confirming its upregulation in NMIBC compared to MIBC samples. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Student’s t-test. Data are shown as mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant
    Anti Rab11a, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+rab11a/Rab11+XP+Rabbit+mAb/pmc12807430-136-36-37
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti rab11a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Identification and validation of RAB11A as an FGFR3-related gene in NMIBC. ( A ) Differential gene expression analysis of TCGA bladder cancer dataset comparing Ta (non-invasive) versus T1–T4 (invasive) stages. RAB11A was identified as one of the significantly upregulated genes in Ta tumors. ( B ) Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of patients in the TCGA BLCA cohort grouped by high and low RAB11A expression ( n = 406). Higher RAB11A expression is associated with poorer overall survival. ( C , D ) Correlation analysis of RAB11A and RAB11B expression with FGFR3 expression in TCGA BLCA dataset. RAB11A showed a stronger positive correlation with FGFR3 than other Rab GTPases. ( E , F ) Immunohistochemical staining of RAB11A in tumor samples from NMIBC patients collected at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University ( n = 36), showing elevated expression of RAB11A in Ta-stage tumors. Scale bar = 100 μm. ( G , H ) mRNA and protein levels of RAB11A detected in clinical bladder cancer tissues by qRT-PCR and Western blotting, confirming its upregulation in NMIBC compared to MIBC samples. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Student’s t-test. Data are shown as mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

    Journal: Cellular Oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)

    Article Title: SREBP2-RAB11A-ZDHHC20 axis orchestrates FGFR3 palmitoylation and membrane retention to drive bladder cancer progression

    doi: 10.1007/s13402-026-01163-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Identification and validation of RAB11A as an FGFR3-related gene in NMIBC. ( A ) Differential gene expression analysis of TCGA bladder cancer dataset comparing Ta (non-invasive) versus T1–T4 (invasive) stages. RAB11A was identified as one of the significantly upregulated genes in Ta tumors. ( B ) Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of patients in the TCGA BLCA cohort grouped by high and low RAB11A expression ( n = 406). Higher RAB11A expression is associated with poorer overall survival. ( C , D ) Correlation analysis of RAB11A and RAB11B expression with FGFR3 expression in TCGA BLCA dataset. RAB11A showed a stronger positive correlation with FGFR3 than other Rab GTPases. ( E , F ) Immunohistochemical staining of RAB11A in tumor samples from NMIBC patients collected at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University ( n = 36), showing elevated expression of RAB11A in Ta-stage tumors. Scale bar = 100 μm. ( G , H ) mRNA and protein levels of RAB11A detected in clinical bladder cancer tissues by qRT-PCR and Western blotting, confirming its upregulation in NMIBC compared to MIBC samples. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Student’s t-test. Data are shown as mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies against RAB11A (Cell Signaling Technology, #2413), ZDHHC20 (Novus Biologicals, NBP1-91813) or FGFR3(Abcam, ab137084) were incubated overnight at 4 °C.

    Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Gene Expression, Expressing, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot

    RAB11A promotes cell proliferation and survival in FGFR3-high RT4 bladder cancer cells. ( A – B ) Western blotting and qRT-PCR were performed to evaluate the knockdown efficiency of RAB11A in RT4 cells following lentiviral transduction with sh RAB11A or non-targeting control (shCTL). ( C ) Cell proliferation was measured using CCK-8 assay at the indicated time points. ( D , E ) Colony-formation assays were performed in RT4 cells expressing control shRNA (shCTL) or sh RAB11A . Quantification includes colony number (colonies containing ≥ 50 cells), mean colony diameter, and total crystal-violet staining intensity (OD 590 ) measured after dye solubilization. Cells were seeded at 500 cells/well in 6-well plates and cultured for 12 days before fixation and crystal-violet staining. ( F – H ) Apoptosis and necrosis were assessed using Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining followed by flow cytometry. Early and late apoptotic cells were quantified in parallel with necrotic cell populations. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Student’s t -test. Data are shown as mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

    Journal: Cellular Oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)

    Article Title: SREBP2-RAB11A-ZDHHC20 axis orchestrates FGFR3 palmitoylation and membrane retention to drive bladder cancer progression

    doi: 10.1007/s13402-026-01163-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: RAB11A promotes cell proliferation and survival in FGFR3-high RT4 bladder cancer cells. ( A – B ) Western blotting and qRT-PCR were performed to evaluate the knockdown efficiency of RAB11A in RT4 cells following lentiviral transduction with sh RAB11A or non-targeting control (shCTL). ( C ) Cell proliferation was measured using CCK-8 assay at the indicated time points. ( D , E ) Colony-formation assays were performed in RT4 cells expressing control shRNA (shCTL) or sh RAB11A . Quantification includes colony number (colonies containing ≥ 50 cells), mean colony diameter, and total crystal-violet staining intensity (OD 590 ) measured after dye solubilization. Cells were seeded at 500 cells/well in 6-well plates and cultured for 12 days before fixation and crystal-violet staining. ( F – H ) Apoptosis and necrosis were assessed using Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining followed by flow cytometry. Early and late apoptotic cells were quantified in parallel with necrotic cell populations. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Student’s t -test. Data are shown as mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies against RAB11A (Cell Signaling Technology, #2413), ZDHHC20 (Novus Biologicals, NBP1-91813) or FGFR3(Abcam, ab137084) were incubated overnight at 4 °C.

    Techniques: Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Knockdown, Transduction, Control, CCK-8 Assay, Expressing, shRNA, Staining, Cell Culture, Double Staining, Flow Cytometry

    SREBF2 directly regulates RAB11A transcription in bladder cancer. ( A ) In-silico transcription-factor screening: the RAB11A (-2000–0 bp) promoter was queried against JASPAR, PROMO, LASAGNA-Search and hTFtarget; overlapping hits are shown as a Venn diagram. ( B ) Overall-survival plot obtained from GEPIA2 using TCGA-BLCA data set stratified by median SREBF2 mRNA. ( C ) QRT-PCR validation of SREBF2 mRNA in RT4 cells stably transduced with two independent shRNAs versus non-target control, GAPDH reference. ( D , E ) Evaluation of RAB11A after SREBF2 knock-down. QRT-PCR for transcript levels ( D ) and immunoblot for protein levels ( E ), GAPDH loading control. ( F ) Dual-luciferase reporter assay in parental RT4 cells co-transfected with full-length or truncated RAB11A -promoter firefly constructs plus SREBF2 or empty vector; Renilla used for normalisation. ( G ) ChIP-qPCR of endogenous SREBF2 at the RAB11A promoter, IgG and H3K4me3 as negative and positive controls. ( H ) Immunofluorescence assay to detect the expression of RAB11A after knockdown of SREBF2 . Scale bar = 20 μm. Data represent mean ± SD of three biological replicates; statistics were performed by unpaired two-tailed t-test ( C , D ) or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test ( F , G ). A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

    Journal: Cellular Oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)

    Article Title: SREBP2-RAB11A-ZDHHC20 axis orchestrates FGFR3 palmitoylation and membrane retention to drive bladder cancer progression

    doi: 10.1007/s13402-026-01163-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: SREBF2 directly regulates RAB11A transcription in bladder cancer. ( A ) In-silico transcription-factor screening: the RAB11A (-2000–0 bp) promoter was queried against JASPAR, PROMO, LASAGNA-Search and hTFtarget; overlapping hits are shown as a Venn diagram. ( B ) Overall-survival plot obtained from GEPIA2 using TCGA-BLCA data set stratified by median SREBF2 mRNA. ( C ) QRT-PCR validation of SREBF2 mRNA in RT4 cells stably transduced with two independent shRNAs versus non-target control, GAPDH reference. ( D , E ) Evaluation of RAB11A after SREBF2 knock-down. QRT-PCR for transcript levels ( D ) and immunoblot for protein levels ( E ), GAPDH loading control. ( F ) Dual-luciferase reporter assay in parental RT4 cells co-transfected with full-length or truncated RAB11A -promoter firefly constructs plus SREBF2 or empty vector; Renilla used for normalisation. ( G ) ChIP-qPCR of endogenous SREBF2 at the RAB11A promoter, IgG and H3K4me3 as negative and positive controls. ( H ) Immunofluorescence assay to detect the expression of RAB11A after knockdown of SREBF2 . Scale bar = 20 μm. Data represent mean ± SD of three biological replicates; statistics were performed by unpaired two-tailed t-test ( C , D ) or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test ( F , G ). A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies against RAB11A (Cell Signaling Technology, #2413), ZDHHC20 (Novus Biologicals, NBP1-91813) or FGFR3(Abcam, ab137084) were incubated overnight at 4 °C.

    Techniques: In Silico, Quantitative RT-PCR, Biomarker Discovery, Stable Transfection, Transduction, Control, Knockdown, Western Blot, Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Transfection, Construct, Plasmid Preparation, ChIP-qPCR, Immunofluorescence, Expressing, Two Tailed Test

    Phenylalanine 178 of SREBF2 is indispensable for activating RAB11A transcription and for nucleating nuclear condensates that sequester nascent RAB11A transcripts. ( A ) Immunoblot analysis of SREBF2 -knockdown (KD) RT4 cells re-expressing empty vector (pcDNA), wild-type SREBF2 (pcSREBF2), or the phenylalanine-to-alanine mutant (pcSREBF2-F178A). GAPDH serves as a loading control. ( B ) Dual-luciferase reporter assay using a − 2 kb RAB11A promoter construct (pGRAB-Luc). Co-transfection of wild-type SREBF2 markedly elevates promoter activity, whereas F178A produces only a modest increase; pGL3-Basic without an insert provides the basal reference. Data are mean ± SEM of three biological replicates; one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test. ( C ) ChIP-qPCR in SREBF2 -KD cells transfected with Flag-tagged constructs (pCSRE, pCSRE-F178A, pCVector) Enrichment of the RAB11A promoter is expressed as percentage of input DNA. IgG serves as the negative IP control. ( D ) RNA fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) combined with confocal imaging. Cy3-labelled probes targeting intron 1 of RAB11A (red) were hybridised to SREBF2 -KD cells expressing RFP-tagged SREBF2 constructs (magenta). Controls include scrambled probe, RNase A pretreatment, empty pTagRFP657 vector, and probe-only conditions to validate specificity. Nuclei are counter-stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 10 μm. Data represent mean ± SEM of three independent biological replicates ( n = 3). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test was used for ( B ) and ( C ); unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -tests were used for Manders’ co-localisation coefficients (see Results). A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

    Journal: Cellular Oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)

    Article Title: SREBP2-RAB11A-ZDHHC20 axis orchestrates FGFR3 palmitoylation and membrane retention to drive bladder cancer progression

    doi: 10.1007/s13402-026-01163-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Phenylalanine 178 of SREBF2 is indispensable for activating RAB11A transcription and for nucleating nuclear condensates that sequester nascent RAB11A transcripts. ( A ) Immunoblot analysis of SREBF2 -knockdown (KD) RT4 cells re-expressing empty vector (pcDNA), wild-type SREBF2 (pcSREBF2), or the phenylalanine-to-alanine mutant (pcSREBF2-F178A). GAPDH serves as a loading control. ( B ) Dual-luciferase reporter assay using a − 2 kb RAB11A promoter construct (pGRAB-Luc). Co-transfection of wild-type SREBF2 markedly elevates promoter activity, whereas F178A produces only a modest increase; pGL3-Basic without an insert provides the basal reference. Data are mean ± SEM of three biological replicates; one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test. ( C ) ChIP-qPCR in SREBF2 -KD cells transfected with Flag-tagged constructs (pCSRE, pCSRE-F178A, pCVector) Enrichment of the RAB11A promoter is expressed as percentage of input DNA. IgG serves as the negative IP control. ( D ) RNA fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) combined with confocal imaging. Cy3-labelled probes targeting intron 1 of RAB11A (red) were hybridised to SREBF2 -KD cells expressing RFP-tagged SREBF2 constructs (magenta). Controls include scrambled probe, RNase A pretreatment, empty pTagRFP657 vector, and probe-only conditions to validate specificity. Nuclei are counter-stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 10 μm. Data represent mean ± SEM of three independent biological replicates ( n = 3). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test was used for ( B ) and ( C ); unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -tests were used for Manders’ co-localisation coefficients (see Results). A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies against RAB11A (Cell Signaling Technology, #2413), ZDHHC20 (Novus Biologicals, NBP1-91813) or FGFR3(Abcam, ab137084) were incubated overnight at 4 °C.

    Techniques: Western Blot, Knockdown, Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Mutagenesis, Control, Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Construct, Cotransfection, Activity Assay, ChIP-qPCR, Transfection, Fluorescence, In Situ, Hybridization, Imaging, Staining, Comparison, Two Tailed Test

    Transcriptome and protein analyses reveal that RAB11A modulates FGFR3 membrane localization but not total expression. ( A ) Differential gene expression was analyzed by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of RT4 cells transduced with sh RAB11A or shCTL. Volcano plot was generated to visualize significantly upregulated and downregulated genes (adjusted p < 0.05, |log2FC| > 1). ( B ) Heatmap displaying the top 100 differentially expressed genes between the two groups based on Z-score normalized expression values. ( C ) Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed on downregulated genes using the DAVID database, and significant pathways were plotted based on –log10 adjusted p-values. ( D , E ) Quantitative real-time PCR ( D ) and Western blot ( E ) were conducted to detect FGFR3 mRNA and total protein expression in shCTL and sh RAB11A cells. GAPDH served as internal control. ( F ) Flow cytometry was performed to evaluate surface and total levels of FGFR3 in RT4 cells. Cells were stained with anti-FGFR3 antibody with or without permeabilization. Fluorescence intensity was quantified, and the ratio of membrane-to-total FGFR3 signal was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. Data are presented as mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

    Journal: Cellular Oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)

    Article Title: SREBP2-RAB11A-ZDHHC20 axis orchestrates FGFR3 palmitoylation and membrane retention to drive bladder cancer progression

    doi: 10.1007/s13402-026-01163-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Transcriptome and protein analyses reveal that RAB11A modulates FGFR3 membrane localization but not total expression. ( A ) Differential gene expression was analyzed by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of RT4 cells transduced with sh RAB11A or shCTL. Volcano plot was generated to visualize significantly upregulated and downregulated genes (adjusted p < 0.05, |log2FC| > 1). ( B ) Heatmap displaying the top 100 differentially expressed genes between the two groups based on Z-score normalized expression values. ( C ) Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed on downregulated genes using the DAVID database, and significant pathways were plotted based on –log10 adjusted p-values. ( D , E ) Quantitative real-time PCR ( D ) and Western blot ( E ) were conducted to detect FGFR3 mRNA and total protein expression in shCTL and sh RAB11A cells. GAPDH served as internal control. ( F ) Flow cytometry was performed to evaluate surface and total levels of FGFR3 in RT4 cells. Cells were stained with anti-FGFR3 antibody with or without permeabilization. Fluorescence intensity was quantified, and the ratio of membrane-to-total FGFR3 signal was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. Data are presented as mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies against RAB11A (Cell Signaling Technology, #2413), ZDHHC20 (Novus Biologicals, NBP1-91813) or FGFR3(Abcam, ab137084) were incubated overnight at 4 °C.

    Techniques: Membrane, Expressing, Gene Expression, RNA Sequencing, Transduction, Generated, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Western Blot, Control, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Fluorescence, Two Tailed Test

    RAB11A regulates FGFR3 palmitoylation and protein stability through interaction with ZDHHC20. ( A – C ) RT4 cells transduced with sh RAB11A or shCTL were treated with 200 ng/mL cycloheximide (CHX) for the indicated times. Whole-cell lysates were collected and analyzed by western blot using antibodies against phospho-FGFR3 (p-FGFR3), total FGFR3, and GAPDH. Band intensities were quantified using ImageJ. ( D – E ) Acyl–biotin exchange (ABE)–like assay using hydroxylamine (HAM) treatment was performed to detect palmitoylated FGFR3. Calnexin served as a positive control. Palmitoylation ratios were calculated based on densitometric comparison of the HAM (+) and HAM (–) lanes. ( F – G ) Co-immunoprecipitation assays were performed in HEK293T cells co-transfected with HA-ZDHHC20 and either Flag-tagged FGFR3 or Myc-tagged RAB11A. Protein complexes were immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag or anti-HA antibodies and analyzed by western blot. ( H ) RT4 cells stably expressing shRNA targeting ZDHHC20 (sh ZDHHC20 ) or control shRNA (shCTL) were subjected to western blot analysis with antibodies against FGFR3, ZDHHC20, and GAPDH. Knockdown of ZDHHC20 markedly reduced FGFR3 protein levels. ( I ) Palmitoylation of FGFR3 was assessed by HAM-dependent ABE assay in ZDHHC20 -knockdown (sh ZDHHC20 ) or control (shCTL) RT4 cells. Band intensities were quantified, showing reduced FGFR3 palmitoylation upon ZDHHC20 depletion. ( J ) Immunofluorescence confocal microscopy of RT4 cells transduced with shCTL, sh RAB11A , or sh ZDHHC20 . Cells were stained for endogenous RAB11A (green), ZDHHC20 (red), and FGFR3 (magenta). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 10 μm. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

    Journal: Cellular Oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)

    Article Title: SREBP2-RAB11A-ZDHHC20 axis orchestrates FGFR3 palmitoylation and membrane retention to drive bladder cancer progression

    doi: 10.1007/s13402-026-01163-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: RAB11A regulates FGFR3 palmitoylation and protein stability through interaction with ZDHHC20. ( A – C ) RT4 cells transduced with sh RAB11A or shCTL were treated with 200 ng/mL cycloheximide (CHX) for the indicated times. Whole-cell lysates were collected and analyzed by western blot using antibodies against phospho-FGFR3 (p-FGFR3), total FGFR3, and GAPDH. Band intensities were quantified using ImageJ. ( D – E ) Acyl–biotin exchange (ABE)–like assay using hydroxylamine (HAM) treatment was performed to detect palmitoylated FGFR3. Calnexin served as a positive control. Palmitoylation ratios were calculated based on densitometric comparison of the HAM (+) and HAM (–) lanes. ( F – G ) Co-immunoprecipitation assays were performed in HEK293T cells co-transfected with HA-ZDHHC20 and either Flag-tagged FGFR3 or Myc-tagged RAB11A. Protein complexes were immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag or anti-HA antibodies and analyzed by western blot. ( H ) RT4 cells stably expressing shRNA targeting ZDHHC20 (sh ZDHHC20 ) or control shRNA (shCTL) were subjected to western blot analysis with antibodies against FGFR3, ZDHHC20, and GAPDH. Knockdown of ZDHHC20 markedly reduced FGFR3 protein levels. ( I ) Palmitoylation of FGFR3 was assessed by HAM-dependent ABE assay in ZDHHC20 -knockdown (sh ZDHHC20 ) or control (shCTL) RT4 cells. Band intensities were quantified, showing reduced FGFR3 palmitoylation upon ZDHHC20 depletion. ( J ) Immunofluorescence confocal microscopy of RT4 cells transduced with shCTL, sh RAB11A , or sh ZDHHC20 . Cells were stained for endogenous RAB11A (green), ZDHHC20 (red), and FGFR3 (magenta). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 10 μm. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t -test. Data are shown as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies against RAB11A (Cell Signaling Technology, #2413), ZDHHC20 (Novus Biologicals, NBP1-91813) or FGFR3(Abcam, ab137084) were incubated overnight at 4 °C.

    Techniques: Transduction, Western Blot, Positive Control, Comparison, Immunoprecipitation, Transfection, Stable Transfection, Expressing, shRNA, Control, Knockdown, Immunofluorescence, Confocal Microscopy, Staining, Two Tailed Test

    Cholesterol-rich lipid rafts are required for proper membrane localisation of FGFR3. ( A ) Detergent-resistant membrane (DRM) fractionation. RT4 shCTL, sh RAB11A and sh ZDHHC20 cells Lysates were adjusted to 40% sucrose, over-layered with 35%, 30%, 25%, 15% and 5% sucrose steps and centrifuged at 200 000 g for 18 h (SW-41 rotor, 4 °C). Fractions F1–F4 and the detergent-soluble pellet were collected, equalised for protein and analysed by SDS-PAGE with antibodies against FGFR3, Caveolin-1and Transferrin-R. ( B ) Confocal co-localisation of FGFR3 with GM1. Cells were fixed and surface-labelled with Alexa Fluor 555–cholera-toxin B, briefly permeabilized and stained with anti-FGFR3 (1: 200) plus Alexa 488 secondary antibody. Nuclei were counter-stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 10 μm. ( C , D ) Flow-cytometric assessment of surface FGFR3 after acute modulation of plasma-membrane cholesterol. RT4 cells were treated at 37 °C for 30 min with vehicle or 10 mM methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD); a subset of MβCD-treated cells was subsequently incubated with 2 mM MβCD–cholesterol complex for 1 h, and an additional group received 2 mM MβCD–cholesterol alone. The cells were stained with APC-conjugated anti-FGFR3 extracellular antibody together with an APC-matched isotype control; propidium iodide was used to exclude dead cells. ( C ) Representative histogram overlays; ( D ) geometric mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) normalized to the isotype control from three independent experiments

    Journal: Cellular Oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)

    Article Title: SREBP2-RAB11A-ZDHHC20 axis orchestrates FGFR3 palmitoylation and membrane retention to drive bladder cancer progression

    doi: 10.1007/s13402-026-01163-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Cholesterol-rich lipid rafts are required for proper membrane localisation of FGFR3. ( A ) Detergent-resistant membrane (DRM) fractionation. RT4 shCTL, sh RAB11A and sh ZDHHC20 cells Lysates were adjusted to 40% sucrose, over-layered with 35%, 30%, 25%, 15% and 5% sucrose steps and centrifuged at 200 000 g for 18 h (SW-41 rotor, 4 °C). Fractions F1–F4 and the detergent-soluble pellet were collected, equalised for protein and analysed by SDS-PAGE with antibodies against FGFR3, Caveolin-1and Transferrin-R. ( B ) Confocal co-localisation of FGFR3 with GM1. Cells were fixed and surface-labelled with Alexa Fluor 555–cholera-toxin B, briefly permeabilized and stained with anti-FGFR3 (1: 200) plus Alexa 488 secondary antibody. Nuclei were counter-stained with DAPI. Scale bar = 10 μm. ( C , D ) Flow-cytometric assessment of surface FGFR3 after acute modulation of plasma-membrane cholesterol. RT4 cells were treated at 37 °C for 30 min with vehicle or 10 mM methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD); a subset of MβCD-treated cells was subsequently incubated with 2 mM MβCD–cholesterol complex for 1 h, and an additional group received 2 mM MβCD–cholesterol alone. The cells were stained with APC-conjugated anti-FGFR3 extracellular antibody together with an APC-matched isotype control; propidium iodide was used to exclude dead cells. ( C ) Representative histogram overlays; ( D ) geometric mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) normalized to the isotype control from three independent experiments

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies against RAB11A (Cell Signaling Technology, #2413), ZDHHC20 (Novus Biologicals, NBP1-91813) or FGFR3(Abcam, ab137084) were incubated overnight at 4 °C.

    Techniques: Membrane, Fractionation, SDS Page, Staining, Clinical Proteomics, Incubation, Control, Fluorescence

    In vivo validation of the RAB11A–ZDHHC20 axis in regulating bladder tumor growth. ( A ) RT4 cells stably expressing shCTL, sh RAB11A , or sh ZDHHC20 were subcutaneously injected into BALB/c nude mice (5 mice/group). Tumor volume was measured every other day using calipers, and calculated as (length × width²)/2. Tumors were harvested on Day 28 and weighed. ( B ) Tumor tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and photographed. ( C ) Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor sections were subjected to multiplex immunofluorescence. ( D ) Multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) of FFPE xenograft sections using Opal™ TSA reagents (Akoya Biosciences) detected RAB11A (Opal 520, red), ZDHHC20 (Opal 570, magenta) and FGFR3 (Opal 650, green); nuclei were counter-stained with DAPI (blue). Images were captured on a Vectra Polaris multispectral scanner and spectrally unmixed with inForm 2.4. Scale bar = 100 μm. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. Data are shown as mean ± SD. p -values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant

    Journal: Cellular Oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)

    Article Title: SREBP2-RAB11A-ZDHHC20 axis orchestrates FGFR3 palmitoylation and membrane retention to drive bladder cancer progression

    doi: 10.1007/s13402-026-01163-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: In vivo validation of the RAB11A–ZDHHC20 axis in regulating bladder tumor growth. ( A ) RT4 cells stably expressing shCTL, sh RAB11A , or sh ZDHHC20 were subcutaneously injected into BALB/c nude mice (5 mice/group). Tumor volume was measured every other day using calipers, and calculated as (length × width²)/2. Tumors were harvested on Day 28 and weighed. ( B ) Tumor tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and photographed. ( C ) Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor sections were subjected to multiplex immunofluorescence. ( D ) Multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) of FFPE xenograft sections using Opal™ TSA reagents (Akoya Biosciences) detected RAB11A (Opal 520, red), ZDHHC20 (Opal 570, magenta) and FGFR3 (Opal 650, green); nuclei were counter-stained with DAPI (blue). Images were captured on a Vectra Polaris multispectral scanner and spectrally unmixed with inForm 2.4. Scale bar = 100 μm. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. Data are shown as mean ± SD. p -values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant

    Article Snippet: Primary antibodies against RAB11A (Cell Signaling Technology, #2413), ZDHHC20 (Novus Biologicals, NBP1-91813) or FGFR3(Abcam, ab137084) were incubated overnight at 4 °C.

    Techniques: In Vivo, Biomarker Discovery, Stable Transfection, Expressing, Injection, Formalin-fixed Paraffin-Embedded, Multiplex Assay, Immunofluorescence, Immunohistochemistry, Staining